News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google Kubernetes Engine's third consecutive day of servi... by scarface74 on Sunday November 11, 2018 @06:28PM (#18429392)
That does bring up an interesting point. In hindsight, we already have duplicate infrastructure - a dev account and a production account. Why in the world was it decided to put both accounts in the same region?

The separate account was setup partially on my insistence but it was set up in the same region.

If needed, we could have done VPC peerings across regions. (https://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2017/11/announcin...)

Re:Google Kubernetes Engine's third consecutive day of servi... by devonkim on Monday November 12, 2018 @01:19AM (#18430912)
In most of the cases I've seen so far with multiple regions / POP (4 different companies of different sizes and verticals) the software never being deployed in another reason is the fundamental reason. Reasons ranged from "we hard-coded us-east-1 everywhere and don't know how to test region independence it turns out" to "we have 3 weeks to try to make our software distributed between different regions but have nowhere near the resources to test it well let alone develop anything new for it." Automation is completely remedial and non-repeatable in most of these companies that rarely provision clean environments from scratch. By keeping regions the same between different environments, you reduce the number of possible differences.

Some services in AWS are also not available in others (I'm quite familiar with AWS Data Pipeline not being available outside the "core" regions like us-east-1, eu-west-1) and having services in one region make usage of resources in another region is a huge change when most developers outside ones with technology literate customers are under the gun to push features out fast over sound design. The matrix of services and configurations necessary to mix and match regions and availability zones is non-trivial if you make extensive usage of AWS services above the IAAS layer.

Also, cross-region VPC peering has a TON of limitations that rather annoying depending upon how well your network has been architected (by default in most companies outside enterprises with a deep bench of network engineers, this would be rated at "complete crap barely better than a typical home wifi network"). Heck, even though I'm non-dumb at networks I have to keep reminding myself of various cross-region VPC limitations when working with refactoring cross-region VPCs like where you can reference security groups, how to propagate Route 53 records, etc.

Re:Google Kubernetes Engine's third consecutive day of servi... by dodobirdlord on Sunday November 11, 2018 @09:12PM (#18430116)
There are some significant differences region to region in AWS. Different numbers of availability zones, different latencies based on datacenter location, different types and availabilities of EC2 instances, etc. I think it makes sense to develop in the same region that your production service runs in just so you don't shoot yourself in the foot by deploying something that runs fine in your development region but doesn't run as well in your production region.