News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:NH judge orders Amazon to give Echo recordings in murder ... by icelancer on Saturday November 10, 2018 @05:57AM (#18420812)
Though the person is being a slight jerk with the last sentence in this comment, there's no reason to mass-downvote someone just because they don't value their privacy as much as anyone else. The poster is not telling people they should not value privacy, only that the poster does not in exchange for utility.
Re:NH judge orders Amazon to give Echo recordings in murder ... by danso on Saturday November 10, 2018 @11:40AM (#18422073)
Even without that last sentence, the comment is not helpful. We’re not told what the user sees as the benefits of Alexa, and we don’t know what he sees as the privacy trade offs. It’s possible he uses Alexa for some lifesaving utility that far outweighs even if Amazon were illegally violating his privacy. Or maybe he’s ignorant tot he specifics of what Echo and Amazon do/don’t collect. And anyone who replies is forced to play the annoying game of read-my-mind/how-dare-you-assume-that’s-what-I-meant.
Re:NH judge orders Amazon to give Echo recordings in murder ... by nhauz on Saturday November 10, 2018 @12:37PM (#18422371)
It is a useful comment in an echo chamber like HN's. And seeing the downvotes it has received, it's double useful.
Re:NH judge orders Amazon to give Echo recordings in murder ... by oAlbe on Saturday November 10, 2018 @10:25AM (#18421658)
I think they have been massively downvoted because they were being a jerk, not because they (don't) value their privacy.