Re:SEC settles with EtherDelta founder for running an unlice...
by miguelmota on Friday November 09, 2018 @03:53AM
(#18413182)
When the exchange was launched, the SEC didn't mention that ether was a security or tokens for that matter. How can they came back years later and back-charge for things that were not illegal at the time? Seems largely unfair and plain greedy. Are 0x protocol relayers next to be charged by the SEC?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:SEC settles with EtherDelta founder for running an unlice...
by arthurcolle on Friday November 09, 2018 @08:49AM
(#18414280)
almost certainly yes