News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Strong Free Will Theorem (2009) [pdf] by okintheory on Wednesday November 07, 2018 @01:43PM (#18401158)
I think you're taking the wrong message away from the following simple idea: "Good decisions depend on taking the available information into account." If we take this for granted, then it's not clear why free will is a good thing.

How would you say pre-determined actions and free will are compatible? I would say they are not (and indeed randomness doesn't really help). In contrast, I would claim that the only sensible definition of free will is based on dualism: Many people seem believe there's some inherent aspect of them that is separate from the physical world and is the source of their self and will. If, like me, you don't believe in dualism, then the conclusion is that we don't have free will.

Re:The Strong Free Will Theorem (2009) [pdf] by tylerjwilk00 on Wednesday November 07, 2018 @03:56PM (#18402343)
The only conclusion here is that you believe free will can only be explained by dualism. Quantum nonlocality [1] provides at least one other explanation as a place free will may hide.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_nonlocality

Re:The Strong Free Will Theorem (2009) [pdf] by okintheory on Friday November 09, 2018 @11:51AM (#18415803)
Could you elaborate on what the definition of free will you're going by is? And how it's possibly supported by quantum non-locality?