Presumably these "fugitives" include parents with kids at the stadium who are behind on support payments or have outstanding parking fines, or perhaps something else that will initiate a high risk police encounter that will at best disadvantage them in a background check?
I've worked in privacy policy in government and the people building FR techs are equipping monkeys with guns.
Sure, someone else will do it, but at least weapons manufacturers have rules about who they can sell to.
I think we'll get regulation of gallery sharing, which will effectively halt the ability for total surveillance.
Everyone assumes this tech is much better than it actually is. For media, treating it like an end to freedom is good for their click-revenues. But in actuality, FR is a kinda weak sensor that needs to be backed with additional identifying technologies to be practical. Defeating FR is childs' play. Even the very best...