News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:VirtualBox E1000 Guest-to-Host Escape by TheSpiceIsLife on Wednesday November 07, 2018 @12:19AM (#18397246)
Sorry, I should have been clearer. I meant a non-darknet market.

Like somehow being able to have a third party negotiate payout rates for bug bounties.

I have no idea what the might look like.

Re:VirtualBox E1000 Guest-to-Host Escape by cthor on Wednesday November 07, 2018 @01:08AM (#18397401)
Probably would look like a union (a dirty word in software), where their collective bargaining allows them to have leverage on software firms and have policies to punish non-payment in an ethical way.

Sequence looks something like: Security researcher submits exploit to the union. Union verifies it and decides it's worth $x. They inform software firm of the exploit and a deadline for payment. If payment is received before deadline, they get full, private disclosure. If not, then exploit is made public. Union takes a cut.

Security researchers don't really need a market maker. (It's not a real market: Actually converting exploits into money is typically antisocial and illegal.) They need someone to negotiate for them.

Re:VirtualBox E1000 Guest-to-Host Escape by jstanley on Wednesday November 07, 2018 @01:54AM (#18397513)
That's starting to sound quite close to blackmail.

"I have remote code execution in your product, pay me XXX or I'll tell everyone".

I don't actually know if it is blackmail, but if it is, hiding behind a union isn't enough to make it not-blackmail.