I made commentary without making a value judgement, and you're telling me it's impossible and that I need to.
Then you respond to my question with a value judgement rather than actually answer my question.
I don't care about your political opinions, and I don't care to state mine here now.
There's something wrong when you can't discuss facts necessarily bringing in a moral side. And you seem reluctant to even acknowledge the facts to begin with.
I, of course, have my own opinions around voting and Democracy. I just chose not to share them in this venue, as it's beside the point.
Not in politics. Facts about politics are useless devoid of moral context. "The Republican Party is the party of Lincoln" is both true and utterly meaningless.
This is different from, say, sports, where you can talk about facts without invoking a moral context. Politics is different. Very very different. Elections have enormous consequences. Lives are at stake.
> I just chose not to share them in this venue, as it's beside the point.
It's not besides the point.
To respond to your edit, it is not a coincidence that the party supporting expanded voting rights is the party that's more inclusive in other respects as well.