News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A faster, cheaper path to fusion energy by andrewflnr on Monday November 05, 2018 @11:21PM (#18388341)
Because a conventional war is still a better outcome than any size of nuclear exchange. Do you really want no middle ground between zero and global nuclear fallout? Everyone knows this and will avoid nuclear way, which is why your assertion that it will come to nukes anyway is overly pessimistic. No one wants a nuclear war.
Re:A faster, cheaper path to fusion energy by eloff on Tuesday November 06, 2018 @01:47AM (#18388928)
I think you're deluding yourself that a war between major powers won't end in a nuclear exchange. If it's a total war anyway. If is just a skirmish then likely not.
Re:A faster, cheaper path to fusion energy by andrewflnr on Tuesday November 06, 2018 @10:02PM (#18396831)
...but you still want to make it impossible to have just a skirmish?
Re:A faster, cheaper path to fusion energy by eloff on Sunday November 11, 2018 @04:10AM (#18425567)
What for? Just stay back on the defensive and mind your own business.