News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Two major research funders to bar grantees from publishin... by xamuel on Monday November 05, 2018 @10:53AM (#18383252)
>pre-prints on their websites

People don't realize how inadequate this is long-term. Hundreds of years from now when scholars look back at the early 21st century, it's going to look like the dark ages.

Re:Two major research funders to bar grantees from publishin... by tialaramex on Monday November 05, 2018 @02:53PM (#18385365)
Institutions with pro-OA policies will either require their employees to shove stuff into their own archive, or they'll automatically crawl their staff's sites to add to the archives. Those archives are usually controlled by the same department as the university's library, people who already have some idea about preserving things for "hundreds of years from now".

In the UK the funding mechanism for (some?) academic research hinges on publication data so there's a rationale for bean counters to ensure the archive is properly funded - if you build this Open Access archive you get the data for your funding paperwork as an output. So this creates an incentive even in fields where Open Access is not normal.

(e.g. big swathes of Physics are OA, same in Computer Science, but for all I know Paleontology is a desert for open access)

Re:Two major research funders to bar grantees from publishin... by chrisseaton on Monday November 05, 2018 @11:57AM (#18383848)
You can publish in the conferences and journals, which maintain the archives and (I think?) still physically print and deposit in libraries of record.

But still also put the pre-print on your website.

Re:Two major research funders to bar grantees from publishin... by z0r on Monday November 05, 2018 @10:58AM (#18383306)
the Internet Archive may prevent this from happening, despite retroactive robots.txt declarations and other such nonsense