News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:'Human brain' supercomputer with 1M processors switched o... by liftbigweights on Monday November 05, 2018 @10:23AM (#18382952)
"200 million million", "actions per second" and "100 million moving parts".

Why write like this?

Either the writer is trying to dumb it down to a ridiculous level or they have no idea what they are talking about and just threw technical words together.

Re:'Human brain' supercomputer with 1M processors switched o... by jwmerrill on Monday November 05, 2018 @11:20AM (#18383509)
I think 200 million million is a British English thing because of the long scale/short scale ambiguity:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Long_and_short_scales

Re:'Human brain' supercomputer with 1M processors switched o... by EmbarrassedFuel on Monday November 05, 2018 @11:27AM (#18383578)
As a Brit, no one has made the million/milliard distinction for my entire life. 1000 million is a billion as far as anyone is concerned, a million million is a trillion. It’s just comically bad writing.
Re:'Human brain' supercomputer with 1M processors switched o... by jwmerrill on Monday November 05, 2018 @12:52PM (#18384322)
Good to know.

I think the writing in this article is not so good, but I've seen this usage by plenty of respectable writers. Stephen Hawking's "A Brief History of Time" is not comically bad writing, and it's full of even more outlandish usages of "million million million ..."

https://www.google.com/search?q=brief+history+of+time+"milli...

Re:'Human brain' supercomputer with 1M processors switched o... by EmbarrassedFuel on Monday November 05, 2018 @04:19PM (#18386074)
Ah yes point taken: I was implying that the author had used this (nowadays) non-standard construction in order to add some sensationalism.
Re:'Human brain' supercomputer with 1M processors switched o... by transpy on Monday November 05, 2018 @11:45AM (#18383747)
I am laughing at this. He is describing it as if it were a steampunk device.