News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why Echo Chambers Are Useful [pdf] by nl on Sunday November 04, 2018 @10:06PM (#18379586)
it's probably more effective to use that lack of verification to police misinformation within the echo chamber than to introduce members that could offer contradictory - but also potentially false - information.

Putting aside the verification problem for a minute, doesn't the echo chamber problem lead almost automatically to group think?

I do machine learning, and I see a strong analogy here with overfitting. If all the data is from a subset of of population and it is never validated outside that subset then the model will become strong on that subset data but much weaker outside.

In machine learning we use a variety of regularization techniques to combat this. One thing that actually works pretty well to build robust models is (a small amount of) mislabeled data: the model learns not to depend on any single feature.

Re:Why Echo Chambers Are Useful [pdf] by pjc50 on Monday November 05, 2018 @05:20AM (#18381200)
What do people actually mean by "groupthink" here and why precisely is it bad? Everyone drives on the same side of the road and (mostly) follows the same traffic rules and we don't call it "groupdrive".

Surely having everyone believe the same true thing isn't actually bad - nobody calls Maxwell's equations "groupthink" unless they're trying to sell you a perpetual motion machine.

Re:Why Echo Chambers Are Useful [pdf] by nl on Monday November 05, 2018 @06:05AM (#18381392)
Groupthink is a psychological phenomenon that occurs within a group of people in which the desire for harmony or conformity in the group results in an irrational or dysfunctional decision-making outcome. Group members try to minimize conflict and reach a consensus decision without critical evaluation of alternative viewpoints by actively suppressing dissenting viewpoints, and by isolating themselves from outside influences

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Groupthink

The most commonly used example is the Bay of Pigs invasion, where no one advising Kennedy raised any possible negative consequences. That’s seen in contrast to the Cuban Missile crisis a few years later where Kennedy actively sort contrary advice.