News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Fred Rogers wouldn't have wanted to appear in a Google ad by aylmao on Sunday November 04, 2018 @03:17PM (#18377876)
Which makes me wonder, is deodorant something that should be advertised at all?

If your deodorant has some new unique property, etc, then it makes sense to advertise that. And I remember deodorants that did advertise they were careful on the skin, or didn't stain your shirt, were "invisible", longer-lasting, etc.

But if deodorant development has reached a point of stagnation, where no new deodorant tech is being invented and all deodorants are essentially the same, then we're in an interesting economic arrangement.

Macro-economically speaking, is this a company or industry that should keep on growing? The point of capitalism was supposed to be that there was competition in R&D (which brought about progress) and margins (which brought about availability through affordability) and eventually things like the ballpoint pen came to be: ubiquitous products that are extremely cheap and effective at what they do.

You don't see advertisements for the ballpoint pen any more: it's period of R&D and cheapening are long past. The industry is mature, it's done developing and is now producing a steady supply of ballpoint pens for a steady number of employees making a living off of it.

It's just companies today seem addicted to unbound growth and have discovered that R&D and margins aside, they can use advertising to sell more of anything by meddling with emotions.

Re:Fred Rogers wouldn't have wanted to appear in a Google ad by avar on Sunday November 04, 2018 @03:52PM (#18378002)
> You don't see advertisements for the ballpoint pen any more

Google "Ballpoint pen" and you get a whole top row of sponsored links trying to sell ballpoint pens to me.

But sure, ballpoint pens aren't advertised on prime-time TV like products sold to 20-something trying to get an edge on the dating life (deodorant, hairspray etc.). That's an especially lucrative market, but not the target audience of most products.

> Macro-economically speaking, is this a company or industry that should keep on growing? The point of capitalism was supposed to be that there was competition in R&D[...]

One of the main points of capitalism is to decentralize the decision making about what's worthwhile economic activity to a bunch of uncoerced individual decisions.

Does that result in a bunch of money being spent on "pointless" products? Sure, but who's to say what's so important that everyone should do without it?