> Pop physics books may not be the ideal way to do this, but it's probably better than nothing at all.
On the other hand, they are very harmful to serious, but "boring" research proposals.
On the other hand, they are very harmful to serious, but "boring" research proposals.
I think, though, that if you want to understand physics, it probably makes sense to devote some of your time to understanding what physicists are excited about.
I have a feeling (and this is heavy speculation) that a lot of strong physicists were fed on pop physics and science fiction before they learned the hard science. This helps approach the subject with an inborn curiosity, which can focus your attention when learning technical subjects.
Pop physics books may not be the ideal way to do this, but it's probably better than nothing at all.