Re:Fleets of drones could aid searches for lost hikers
by thaumaturgy on Friday November 02, 2018 @08:07PM
(#18367761)
Thanks for the link.
> *...one of the things the program found is that the drones are not good at seeing through tree canopies. This is surprising for me...
Yeah, if you dig around a bit you can find infrared and near-infrared images of trees and forests, and overhead IR shots of forest canopies. Trees give off a surprising amount of IR.
> I'd love to hear more about cases in which IR has made a difference in a search, because that hasn't been my experience or what I've heard about it.
Here's another link where IR was used to find seven missing people, same trial program: https://bc.ctvnews.ca/a-b-c-first-heat-seeking-drone-used-in...
While looking more into this though, they mentioned that one of the things the program found is that the drones are not good at seeing through tree canopies. This is surprising for me, and I suppose answers my question about why this MIT project has some benefit! I stand corrected in that regard.
> There are some environments where IR might help, but many more where it doesn't.
Absolutely. There's no magic solution for finding people. The project here is going to have pros and cons too, you need experienced people to know what tool makes sense where.