News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Things Paul Graham is wrong about by byrneseyeview on Tuesday October 26, 2010 @04:34PM (#1835976)
The last round of YC companies was getting $10M valuations, an order of magnitude over a few years ago, under the valuations-don't-matter mantra.

Are these the valuations that they're getting from YC, or from investors post-YC? If post-YC, couldn't this be due largely to more of the companies being Ramen Profitable? If they raise money after four months rather than three, they've been growing (perhaps at an exponential rate) for 33% longer.

Re:Things Paul Graham is wrong about by drusenko on Tuesday October 26, 2010 @05:21PM (#1836146)
It's a false comparison. No companies in my round (W07) or before that I'm aware of got anywhere near as low as $1M valuations...

For the $500-800k raised that is still popular, "OK" was a $2M pre valuation and "amazing" would have been $5M.

The $10M valuations today for $500-800k (if there are any) are definitely in the "amazing" range, so it's somewhere around a 2x increase.

That could definitely be explained by a more mature set of companies, or companies attacking larger problems.

Re:Things Paul Graham is wrong about by jimbokun on Tuesday October 26, 2010 @06:11PM (#1836347)
Or better YC brand recognition?