Re:Google staff walk out over women's treatment
by dragonwriter on Thursday November 01, 2018 @08:47PM
(#18359859)
> I hope you don’t think I’m suggesting a company should cover up serious crimes
You are suggesting that they should shuffle people around without investigation to quiet complaints of situations against which are obligated by law to protect their employees, including potentially involuntary reassignment of the reporting party (again, without investigation of the facts) despite the legal prohibition on retaliation.
Re:Google staff walk out over women's treatment
by sheepmullet on Thursday November 01, 2018 @09:43PM
(#18360064)
> to quiet complaints
Uh no - to protect their employees from abuse.
> despite the legal prohibition on retaliation.
Why is it retaliation to seperate the accused and accuser?
In fact if you don’t seperate them you are opening yourself up to legal liability and a PR nightmare.
If priests had been moved around for simply leering at a woman or making a suggestive sexual comment I don’t think there would have been any outrage.
I hope you don’t think I’m suggesting a company should cover up serious crimes - or any crimes for that matter.