News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple Reports Fourth Quarter Results by EpicBlackCrayon on Thursday November 01, 2018 @05:39PM (#18358726)
They're eventually going to price themselves out of the market. It's just a matter of when.
Re:Apple Reports Fourth Quarter Results by ryanwaggoner on Thursday November 01, 2018 @07:46PM (#18359514)
Has any huge, ultra-successful, ultra-profitable company ever “priced themselves out of the market”? Not for a single product launch or anything, but in a sustained way that seriously damaged the business long-term?
Re:Apple Reports Fourth Quarter Results by charlesism on Thursday November 01, 2018 @07:55PM (#18359568)
Yes. Apple in the 1990s.

That is why what they ought to know better now. Mind you, they probably do! I think they just worry about the next few quarters. As for the long-term, little personal incentive because "let the next guy or gal deal with that after I've moved on"

Re:Apple Reports Fourth Quarter Results by ryanwaggoner on Thursday November 01, 2018 @08:10PM (#18359660)
Yeah, that’s not what happened to Apple in the 90s. At all.
Re:Apple Reports Fourth Quarter Results by charlesism on Thursday November 01, 2018 @08:48PM (#18359863)
Maybe your memory is playing tricks on you?

It's why I switched to a PC in the 1990s. And everyone I knew. And everyone I met, read or heard about.

What was the point buying a Mac, when you could buy a faster, more compatible PC running Windows 95, which was pretty Mac-like, for half the price?

Re:Apple Reports Fourth Quarter Results by MBCook on Thursday November 01, 2018 @09:21PM (#18359991)
But the Mac was NEVER the majority/success the iPhone is today (at least in the US). It was always way behind. And price was a big part of the problem. Performance wasn’t until much later.
Re:Apple Reports Fourth Quarter Results by charlesism on Thursday November 01, 2018 @09:29PM (#18360021)
Not the Mac, but the Apple II was. When the PC industry began, Apple was king for a few years. Then Commodore overtook them in the home market, and IBM in the workplace.

I'm not sure what you mean about performance? When I switched, I had the impression PCs were outperforming Macs by a long shot. That must have been within a couple years of the Win95 release. I should probably hedge a bit there because my memory might be off. It was a long time ago.

Re:Apple Reports Fourth Quarter Results by MBCook on Thursday November 01, 2018 @09:36PM (#18360042)
The Apple 2, yes. It wasn’t the cheapest but it was certainly the big player in the US.

Performance: Macs were quite competitive, or even better than PCs for quite a while. It was only later as the Intel juggernaut kept going that Apple started to get steamrolled and had to switch off 68k. They regained the crown for a little while, but even the G3/4/5 were quickly overtaken by Intel.

Re:Apple Reports Fourth Quarter Results by charlesism on Thursday November 01, 2018 @09:43PM (#18360068)
I can't remember much about specs. Actually I can't even remember if I knew enough back then to interpret specs! Maybe i just thought PCs felt faster or something :)