Because I agree with Paul on almost everything else. And in fact, I should have stopped at four. (Maybe I should have stopped at zero.)

I think you did well to write this article, although if you zoom out one or two levels of abstraction, you would be in agreement on most, if not all points.

Indeed. But that makes a pretty boring blog post.

To wit: http://rondam.blogspot.com/2010/10/five-things-paul-graham-i...