Re:Google staff walk out over women's treatment
by orf on Thursday November 01, 2018 @05:09PM
(#18358466)
No, he responded with a 12,000 word article with over 60 references. Your reply was nitpicking a single thing that you feel is something important. Its not, the discussion is wider and deeper than that. By the way your point is dealt with in the article itself. The one you definitely read
Re:Google staff walk out over women's treatment
by _Tev on Thursday November 01, 2018 @08:28PM
(#18359769)
What about citing some arguments from the article, so not everyone has to read 12000 words and wade throuh 60 references. It would be easier for everyone to check the validity of the argument then.
There has not been any counterpoint to original disputing of the citation.
> "Women earn less than men at every wage level"
It's utterly useless to compare wage levels across different roles. I read the article, I strongly disagree with it.
Do you really think comparing the pay of people in different roles is useful? It's apples and oranges. I don't expect a nurse and an engineer to make the same amount of money. This is my argument and it's not in bad faith.