News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Feds: Chinese spies orchestrated hack that stole aviation... by kodablah on Wednesday October 31, 2018 @05:46PM (#18349533)
> Apparently a major contributor to their downfall was all of the IP being stolen

If a company is heavily dependent upon existing IP then having it all stolen will be a major contributor to their downfall. But so is that dependence. Hard to make suggestions without appearing to victim blame, but companies need to be able to survive even without secrets.

Re:Feds: Chinese spies orchestrated hack that stole aviation... by exnorrtel on Wednesday October 31, 2018 @05:51PM (#18349558)
I didn't want to pin the downfall of Nortel completely on the IP being stolen and being outmanoeuvred in deals.

During the dot-com bust they also lost a bunch of money selling carriers equipment on credit and that is when the tough times and inability of the executives to right the ship began.

Re:Feds: Chinese spies orchestrated hack that stole aviation... by oh_sigh on Wednesday October 31, 2018 @06:19PM (#18349701)
Why? If you follow that standard, you are basically saying that no R&D should ever be done, because you may just get it stolen and lose any kind of benefit you would derive from doing the R&D in the first place.
Re:Feds: Chinese spies orchestrated hack that stole aviation... by kodablah on Wednesday October 31, 2018 @06:30PM (#18349758)
That's not what I'm saying. I'm saying don't build an overly large dependence on past R&D where resting on those laurels threatens the whole company if theft occurs.
Re:Feds: Chinese spies orchestrated hack that stole aviation... by DataWorker on Wednesday October 31, 2018 @08:24PM (#18350440)
Couldn’t the new R&D be stolen as well? It sounds like you don’t like Coca Cola classic.
Re:Feds: Chinese spies orchestrated hack that stole aviation... by cwkoss on Wednesday October 31, 2018 @07:20PM (#18350041)
A company who "goes out of business because their IP was stolen" was already going out of business before it was stolen.