Re:Show HN: Basilica – word2vec for anything
by sjg007 on Wednesday October 31, 2018 @02:52PM
(#18348304)
I mean both are correct given the literature at this point. Maybe the use of embedding captures the notion that you are mapping through a NN which is a variable function of sorts instead of a single or set of linear or orthonormal functions.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Show HN: Basilica – word2vec for anything
by FridgeSeal on Wednesday October 31, 2018 @10:59PM
(#18351151)
The mathematical term "Embedding" refers to finding a lower dimensional representation of some high(er) dimensional data, whether this is done with single function (maybe hand chosen) or a neural network doesn't matter.
Re:Show HN: Basilica – word2vec for anything
by sjg007 on Thursday November 01, 2018 @09:12AM
(#18353537)
I don't think that's quite right.. According to wikipedia, embedding is:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Embedding
So Projection sounds closer to what you describe. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Projection_(mathematics)
So my original comment is not quite right either. The embedding is a structure preserving map. A projection isn't necessarily structure preserving. ''' To be an embedding, such a mapping must preserve order "both ways": ''' http://mathworld.wolfram.com/Embedding.html
I think that a projection from p dimensions to q<p dimensions isn't structure preserving.
At this point a mathematician may be able to explain more.
Re:Show HN: Basilica – word2vec for anything
by xapata on Thursday November 01, 2018 @12:08PM
(#18355388)
SVMs project the data into a higher dimensional space, not lower. A mixed blob of dots on a plane can't be cleanly separated by a line into two colors, but if you blow them out into a cube by some arbitrary projection, a plane will be able to separate them cleanly.