News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Technology preview: Sealed sender for Signal by ardy42 on Monday October 29, 2018 @10:51PM (#18333690)
> No, it's not. By requiring a phone number, Signal does not defend privacy. This is a binary question, there's not a grey area here. It doesn't matter that they're building a social network, or anything else. What matters is that it's not private so long as they require a phone number.

I'm not so sure. A lot of the objections to Signal using phone numbers seem similar to objecting to SSL/TLS because it's not Tor.

Re:Technology preview: Sealed sender for Signal by Sir_Cmpwn on Monday October 29, 2018 @10:56PM (#18333713)
Nice comparison, that gives me some pause. I think that Signal is better positioned to fix the shortcomings in their system than the rest of the world is to fix the shortcomings of SSL/TLS, though.