News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Show HN: Whack – A simply-designed compiled programming l... by wycliffb on Sunday October 28, 2018 @10:39AM (#18320764)
Will commence working on a doc to explain some design choices, and what some non-obvious code fragments do; will update here when I commit. There's no subtyping being done currently. The 'match type' construct matches the type of an expression at compile time. I should also add that some design choices may be reviewed before the first release.
Re:Show HN: Whack – A simply-designed compiled programming l... by dan-robertson on Sunday October 28, 2018 @07:37PM (#18323906)
Surely if match type is compile time and there is no subtyping then it is basically a no-op type assert. I.e. it’s like writing (e : t) in ML?

Or is it supposed to allow for some kind of ad-hoc polymorphism like:

  func foo(x) string {
    match type(x) {
      char** : return “an array of strings”
      int : return “a number”
      default : return “not sure”
    }
  }
And this gets transformed into something like:

  func foo(Type x_t, x_t x) string {
    match(x_t) {
      pointer_t(pointer_t(char_t)) : return ...
      ...
    }
  }
Re:Show HN: Whack – A simply-designed compiled programming l... by wycliffb on Monday October 29, 2018 @05:36AM (#18326095)
Interesting suggestion! Will be sure to add that when I can.