Re:The Periodic Table of Data Structures [pdf]
by russfink on Saturday October 27, 2018 @07:31AM
(#18315294)
I see Tarjan cited but no Sedgewick, or CLRS. I'm against obsequious citations, so I'll give the benefit of the doubt that these aren't needed.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The Periodic Table of Data Structures [pdf]
by bonzini on Saturday October 27, 2018 @08:05AM
(#18315381)
Isn't CLRS mostly a secondary source that puts together previous literature? Citations usually prefer a primary source that lets you place a "discovery" accurately in date and place (aka conference/journal).
Re:The Periodic Table of Data Structures [pdf]
by thrower123 on Saturday October 27, 2018 @09:23AM
(#18315588)
CLRS is wildly overrated; it's got a lot of odd gaps in the data structures that it does cover, and wastes a lot of time and space on esoteric junk.