Re:A Dark Consensus About Screens and Kids Begins to Emerge ...
by tdsamardzhiev on Friday October 26, 2018 @01:06PM
(#18311079)
I disagree. APM/APS is a requirement to play StarCraft well just like physical prowess is a requirement to play hockey. But it's far from being the only requirement.
Re:A Dark Consensus About Screens and Kids Begins to Emerge ...
by yifanl on Friday October 26, 2018 @02:57PM
(#18311873)
The ingame Very Hard bot in SC2 can reach well over 2000 APM, but it's still perfectly possible for the average player to beat it.
Re:A Dark Consensus About Screens and Kids Begins to Emerge ...
by lanius on Friday October 26, 2018 @02:40PM
(#18311770)
I partially agree. You can achieve a decent rank solely through good mechanics (APM, mouse accuracy, etc). However, strategy is definitely important at the higher levels of competition.
You're kidding, right? Those RTS, particularly Starcraft, are an exercise in APS more than anything else.
* For non-gamers, APS = actions per second. Being able to issue more commands than your opponent and "micro" (from the word micromanage) your units to tightly control their behavior are a large part of winning Starcraft. It's fascinating to watch high level Starcraft players clicking their mice at an almost inhuman rate.