News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why almost everyone was wrong about Tesla’s cash flow sit... by smt88 on Friday October 26, 2018 @10:42AM (#18309638)
The short answers are: cars can be resold, so you're only paying for interest, taxes, depreciation, maintenance, repairs, insurance, and gas.

After working with vehicle data for 6 years, I can guarantee that someone who buys a 1-year-old Prius is actually paying less per month than you are for your 2005 Focus.

People who buy brand new cars are obviously paying a huge "drive it off the lot" tax in the form of depreciation, but they know that and think it's worth it. Some people are afraid to buy used, some like to drive a new car.

It's just another example of "it's expensive to be poor". If you can buy a better car, you end up paying less over the course of your owning it.

Of course, that idea breaks down if you buy something unreliable AND expensive. It also becomes fuzzier with luxury cars, since they're expensive to repair.

But a used, super-reliable car that holds value well, like a Prius or a Camry, is generally going to have the lowest total cost of ownership out of the whole spectrum of car options.

Re:Why almost everyone was wrong about Tesla’s cash flow sit... by appleiigs on Friday October 26, 2018 @11:07AM (#18309891)
To add to your "cars can be resold" comment: my friend drives Masaratis. He always has an eye out on used inventory and snags the under-priced ones. Continuously flips them for same price he bought it for after driving for awhile (6 mo to 2 years). Many sellers are the very rich folk constantly buying new cars or who's work have been re-assigned to a different country.
Re:Why almost everyone was wrong about Tesla’s cash flow sit... by smt88 on Friday October 26, 2018 @01:57PM (#18311463)
To add onto this, I bought a Corolla in high school, drove it for 2 years, and sold it for more than I paid for it.