Christie’s sells its first AI portrait for $432k

Re:Christie’s sells its first AI portrait for $432k by eganist on Thursday October 25, 2018 @09:59PM (#18306182)

Interesting. Considering the readme is the first thing the person sees on the github link and nothing about the license itself precludes other contracts, could the bolded text in this context be considered a verbal contract? Or at least enforceable as such?

Edit: Actually, there was a change to the license surrounding pre-trained models and sales back in June, so it's even baked into an obvious contract. A lot of the licensing conversation here is somewhat mooted by this.

https://github.com/robbiebarrat/art-DCGAN/blob/master/LICENS...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Christie’s sells its first AI portrait for $432k by tlrobinson on Friday October 26, 2018 @02:40AM (#18307236)

Obvious references "the collection", which presumably includes the piece auctioned at Christies, in a DM to Robbie in April, before that clause was added: https://twitter.com/obv_ious/status/1055352403837497344

[ Parent | on HN ]