Re:Google paid Andy Rubin $90M while keeping silent about a ...
by matt4077 on Thursday October 25, 2018 @09:34PM
(#18306081)
I mostly agree, but I think:
> At best you could say it might has another name on it.
...does disservice to the influence she had (on Bill & the world) and shortchanges her contribution.
Your point still stands, i.e. that the claims of harm of the policy are post-hoc reasoning and therefore irrelevant its expected utility. But that does not actually conflict with this one particular instance possibly being a lucky coincidence.
> At best you could say it might has another name on it.
...does disservice to the influence she had (on Bill & the world) and shortchanges her contribution.
Your point still stands, i.e. that the claims of harm of the policy are post-hoc reasoning and therefore irrelevant its expected utility. But that does not actually conflict with this one particular instance possibly being a lucky coincidence.