News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google paid Andy Rubin $90M while keeping silent about a ... by danso on Thursday October 25, 2018 @03:42PM (#18303945)
I'm not defending Rubin's situation regarding Google, but I don't think the evidence in his ex-wife's divorce suit is automatically relevant to what led Google to force him out. The email may have been used as evidence of infidelity, not necessarily of (other) sexual misconduct -- the article doesn't say one way or the othewr.
Re:Google paid Andy Rubin $90M while keeping silent about a ... by natch on Friday October 26, 2018 @07:08AM (#18308214)
But I made no claims about its relevance to what led to Google forcing him out.

Can you respond to what I said, instead of something else?

Re:Google paid Andy Rubin $90M while keeping silent about a ... by danso on Friday October 26, 2018 @02:04PM (#18311508)
What's to answer about what you asked? You're making an unjustified assumption about what the ex-wife knows or thinks about his extramarital relationships -- that because the email was in her lawsuit, that it insinuates the relationship is morally wrong (besides being adultery), i.e. "akin to slavery". We simply do not have the info or context to know otherwise.