News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Google paid Andy Rubin $90M while keeping silent about a misconduct claim. Parent comment

Re:Google paid Andy Rubin $90M while keeping silent about a ... by tptacek on Thursday October 25, 2018 @03:04PM (#18303610)
My read of "hypergamy is a real observed phenomenon" is that it is mostly a way of dismissing concerns when they pertain to women employees.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Google paid Andy Rubin $90M while keeping silent about a ... by myWindoonn on Thursday October 25, 2018 @03:22PM (#18303761)
Here, have some empirical evidence. [0]

The Atlantic [1] spends some time with this study, and here are some takeaways. Attractiveness is measured from 0 to 1.

* The headline: People are "hypergamous" (what a terrible word), aiming about 0.25 above their own position

* Women are most attractive (0.62) when young, with sharp falloff; men are most attractive (0.53) in mid-life, with middling falloff

* "Men experience slightly lower reply rates when they write more positively worded messages."

* Different metropolitan areas have different dating patterns

Humans are weird.

[0] http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/4/8/eaap9815

[1] https://www.theatlantic.com/science/archive/2018/08/online-d...

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Google paid Andy Rubin $90M while keeping silent about a ... by tptacek on Thursday October 25, 2018 @03:44PM (#18303953)
I wasn't actually asking for more evidence. I was criticizing the invocation of "hypergamy" as something relevant to the story we're commenting on.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Google paid Andy Rubin $90M while keeping silent about a ... by camelite on Friday October 26, 2018 @04:11AM (#18307559)
The guy who used it was discussing the difficulty of ascertaining whether or not power-imbalances between people in a relationship implies coercion. Women's general preference towards dating up is obviously a factor, so to ascribe a dismissive attitude to anybody who mentions it is uncharitable to say the least.
[ Parent | on HN ]