News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Google paid Andy Rubin $90M while keeping silent about a ... by simonsarris on Thursday October 25, 2018 @02:16PM (#18303155)
> I think it is reasonably easy to prevent people from dating subordinates in the workplace. Up front, you explain that the policy is one word: don't. If it ever happens, you fire the higher-level person promptly. No excuses, no second chances.

This is completely absurd. How many current great relationships would have never existed under such a rule? (Bill and Melinda Gates is the obvious go-to example, or Barack and Michelle Obama, but there are no doubt millions.)

Re:Google paid Andy Rubin $90M while keeping silent about a ... by untog on Thursday October 25, 2018 @02:21PM (#18303206)
> Barack and Michelle Obama

I actually don't think that's true. They met through work, but didn't start dating until her summer term in the job ended.

Re:Google paid Andy Rubin $90M while keeping silent about a ... by pitt1980 on Thursday October 25, 2018 @10:03PM (#18306201)
Other way around, she was his mentor as a summer associate

"Robinson met Barack Obama when they were among the few African Americans at their law firm, Sidley Austin LLP (she has sometimes said only two, although others have noted ut there were others in different departments).[55] She was assigned to mentor him while he was a summer associate.[56] Their relationship started with a business lunch and then a community organization meeting where he first impressed her.[57]"

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michelle_Obama

Re:Google paid Andy Rubin $90M while keeping silent about a ... by nmca on Friday October 26, 2018 @03:12AM (#18307344)
Doesn't the counterfactual matter rather a lot here? I'm reminded of Tim Minchin's "If I didn't have you"
Re:Google paid Andy Rubin $90M while keeping silent about a ... by Brockenstein on Thursday October 25, 2018 @03:16PM (#18303704)
>This is completely absurd. How many current great relationships would have never existed under such a rule?

How many great relationships/working relationships wouldn't be ruined because of that rule?

How many people wouldn't have lives and careers ruined because of that rule?

Frankly if you love someone that damn much, move to a different job and avoid the potential conflicts that are involved. Good luck arguing that a boss absolutely needs the option to date a subordinate because what if a serious relationship never happens?

I mean it's nice if you can pull examples out of the air when it worked out for two people. But for everyone else? What's the ratio of happy couples to victims do you need to tilt scales to one side or the other?