News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:America’s Need for Skilled Immigrants Isn’t Going Away by nradov on Wednesday October 24, 2018 @01:10PM (#18294334)
Decades ago tech companies like IBM would hire entry-level software developers with zero coding experience based on the results of aptitude tests. Then they put the new employees through internal boot camps. There's no reason a similar approach couldn't work today. Employers just generally got lazy about workforce development while the economy was slower and they had an unlimited supply of applicants.
Re:America’s Need for Skilled Immigrants Isn’t Going Away by saalweachter on Thursday October 25, 2018 @10:36AM (#18301196)
It's not just software engineers. This also happens with skilled labor, like machining.

You used to be able to get hired and taught on the job, now the employers expect you to pay your own way through a technical school for several years before applying for a minimum-wage job. So you've got (a) lower wages (b) you need to pay to educate yourself (c) you need to pay to support yourself during those years of training and (d) you're guessing which job skills are going to be in demand after N years, so after spending the time training and taking on debt there might not even be a job waiting for you.

Re:America’s Need for Skilled Immigrants Isn’t Going Away by EmbarrassedFuel on Wednesday October 24, 2018 @02:33PM (#18295103)
In the uk I often see posts for graduate programmer positions with essentially this arrangement: words to the effect of “candidates need not have experience coding but should show a willingness to learn and deep interest in tech” etc.
Re:America’s Need for Skilled Immigrants Isn’t Going Away by HillaryBriss on Wednesday October 24, 2018 @04:35PM (#18296110)
that's how I see it too.

I feel like the whole question here is simply: how much commitment to the existing US labor pool should US laws/regulations require from US employers?

Over the last decade, the answer has been "not much." But, now, because of political and economic realities, that answer might change.