Re:Microsoft's Windows Phone 7 too little, too late
by karterk on Monday October 25, 2010 @06:23AM
(#1829233)
If they had done that, I am sure you would have commented here saying it looks like a cheap imitation. Have you actually used the phone?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Microsoft's Windows Phone 7 too little, too late
by bad_user on Monday October 25, 2010 @06:37AM
(#1829253)
That's my problem with Microsoft software ... they get hyped months or years in advance with nobody actually using the damn product.
And when a product is hyped, you've got to expect a backslash when it doesn't support basic functionality people got accustomed to.
I also think that if third-party integration like Twitter will be less than what Facebook got ... WinMo 7 is basically screwed.
Re:Microsoft's Windows Phone 7 too little, too late
by steverb on Monday October 25, 2010 @07:19AM
(#1829331)
My understanding is that any app can register itself for any of the hubs, so I don't see any technical reason why a twitter app can't go in the people hub.
No clue whose over-sight it is that the twitter app isn't already there.
Re:Microsoft's Windows Phone 7 too little, too late
by rbanffy on Monday October 25, 2010 @07:58AM
(#1829414)
> they get hyped months or years in advance
Remember how cool was WinFS?
Re:Microsoft's Windows Phone 7 too little, too late
by DjDarkman on Monday October 25, 2010 @08:42AM
(#1829532)
There are stuff that these OS-es got right, and there is no known better way. Not doing the same just for the sake of not being called a copycat is a stupid thing to do. The perfect counter argument for these is: "that's what people were used to"
This all only holds up if there is no known better way.