Amazon Pitches Facial Recognition to Monitor Immigrants

Re:Amazon Pitches Facial Recognition to Monitor Immigrants by fzeroracer on Wednesday October 24, 2018 @12:52AM (#18289810)

And yet you failed to address my point entirely. Which is that far worse crimes in the US end up with more lenient sentencing than immigrants crossing the border.

But fine then, I want to draw up a more apt comparison and I want you to address this. Public intoxication is a misdemeanor similar to crossing the border illegally. How often do you think people caught being publicly intoxicated end up losing custody of their children or being permanently separated from their family?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Amazon Pitches Facial Recognition to Monitor Immigrants by sheepmullet on Wednesday October 24, 2018 @09:05AM (#18292026)

> Public intoxication is a misdemeanor similar to crossing the border illegally.

I’d argue trying to illegally immigrate to the US is a serious crime and public intoxication is not.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Amazon Pitches Facial Recognition to Monitor Immigrants by nilkn on Wednesday October 24, 2018 @01:50AM (#18290012)

As was clear from my first post, and as I stated explicitly in my second, and as I now state explicitly again, I was only commenting on your affluenza comparison. I found the comparison to be meaningless and invalid for the reasons I stated above. I never registered any opinion whatsoever on the specific issues at the border, so in particular I’m curious why you’re so confident I even disagree with you on that. Someone who agrees with your conclusion may still find your path there fallacious.

[ Parent | on HN ]