Re:Technical details of the Google Street View WiFi controve...
by chii on Monday October 25, 2010 @02:50AM
(#1828855)
"If you don't encrypt your traffic, then by implication, you don't care if people eavesdrop on it."
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Technical details of the Google Street View WiFi controve...
by bobf on Monday October 25, 2010 @03:06AM
(#1828881)
Isn't that like saying "if you don't lock your mailbox, then by implication you don't care if people read your mail"? Or, "if you don't lock your telephone junction box, then by implication you don't care if people tap your phone"?
Although I don't agree with your quoted statement, I don't think Google's capturing of data should be considered criminal, either.
Re:Technical details of the Google Street View WiFi controve...
by 124816 on Monday October 25, 2010 @03:16AM
(#1828900)
More like "If you shout loudly in your apartment, expect others to hear you."
Re:Technical details of the Google Street View WiFi controve...
by chowmeined on Monday October 25, 2010 @03:17AM
(#1828904)
The difference is wifi broadcasts that information.