News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:UberCab Ordered to Cease And Desist by llimllib on Sunday October 24, 2010 @03:50PM (#1827052)
> I'm not intimately familiar with the taxi laws, but I bet they don't specify what private organizations can do.

Huh? They have to. They don't let private limo organizations pick you up without a 1-hour reservation, for example, as stated in the article.

Furthermore, Ubercab already is a private organization.

I'm sure I'm missing something, can you explain why it would somehow become legal if it was a members-only organization?

Re:UberCab Ordered to Cease And Desist by gravesryan on Sunday October 24, 2010 @04:57PM (#1827266)
The regulations read that a livery services ride must be "pre-arranged".

We've not seen the hour prior requirement in any law. If it does exist please send it our way, ([email protected]) but we believe that this is opinion not fact.

Re:UberCab Ordered to Cease And Desist by anigbrowl on Sunday October 24, 2010 @07:28PM (#1827680)
I think you should post the C&D order, actually, so as to put the focus on the MTA rather than wasting your time fending off uninformed speculation.

It looks to me as if the $5,000/day fine they're speaking of refers to a modification of the Transportation code creating (among other things) a new offense of 'running a dispatch service without a permit,' which was passed by the SFMTA baord just last Tuesday - although it's still questionable whether or not it would apply to your firm.

Regardless, it has not yet been made law by the Board of Supervisors, nor is it on their legislative agenda for next week's meeting. From what I can see, it can takes months for something to work its way up the Supervisors' calendar. Of course, a lot depends on what sort of lobbying power the Taxi establishment has at City Hall, but it's fair to assume they have years of experience in working the system.

http://www.sfmta.com/cms/cmta/documents/10-19-10calendaritem...

IANAL, mind; just my personal views. I've developed an unhealthy interest in the (dys)function of my local government.

Re:UberCab Ordered to Cease And Desist by llimllib on Sunday October 24, 2010 @05:22PM (#1827334)
I was going off the article, I have no idea.

Anyway, I hope it's clear that I wish you the best of luck fighting this nonsense.

Re:UberCab Ordered to Cease And Desist by defen on Sunday October 24, 2010 @04:06PM (#1827105)
I can open a private, members only club which serves alcohol past the traditional last-call time. In the same way, Ubercab could charge a membership fee, and then only people who are members can be picked up by Ubercab. (I'm not a lawyer so I don't know if this is actually possible, I'm just trying to rephrase tswicegood's argument.)
Re:UberCab Ordered to Cease And Desist by goatforce5 on Sunday October 24, 2010 @04:43PM (#1827218)
Yes, in the same way it becomes totally legal to sell cocaine as long as you only sell to members of your private club.

(Note: IANAL.)

Re:UberCab Ordered to Cease And Desist by stcredzero on Monday October 25, 2010 @12:16AM (#1828507)
Catching a ride in a car is not a schedule 2 drug, fortunately.
Re:UberCab Ordered to Cease And Desist by defen on Sunday October 24, 2010 @09:20PM (#1827988)
It's almost never legal to possess cocaine in the U.S. - it's a schedule II drug. Alcohol is not a controlled substance. AFAIK, I (as a private citizen - not a business) am allowed to serve alcohol to anyone I choose, as long as they are over 21 years of age.
Re:UberCab Ordered to Cease And Desist by sp4rki on Sunday October 24, 2010 @06:41PM (#1827563)
It's my understanding that the hour reservation specifics are basically FUD. Since when can you not call a limo service and say "I need a limo for right NOW! Do you have any?", because I'm pretty sure you can and they will send a limo your way if possible.