Re:Microsoft’s problem isn’t how often it updates Windows, i...
by flarg on Saturday October 20, 2018 @08:19PM
(#18266182)
As a PM I remember the halcyon days when my management would actually request a formal estimate and I would then work with delivery teams to calculate an answer and then add the traditional 50 to 100 pc buffer because I knew they were full of crap/I kept a personal record of their history of estimate vs reality. Nowadays management are in to top down planning so they don't ask for estimates, they don't add realistic buffers so they over promise with one hand and underestimate with the other. Seems to be a trend where everyone thinks they know how to do a PM's job.
Re:Microsoft’s problem isn’t how often it updates Windows, i...
by setquk on Saturday October 20, 2018 @04:15PM
(#18265194)
And a stinking pile of XXXX is exactly what we end up with. Telemetry stuffed, file deleting bug ridden pile of fucking shit.
About ten years ago I had the option of taking the red or the blue pill. I took the Windows pill by mistake.
Re:Microsoft’s problem isn’t how often it updates Windows, i...
by camgunz on Saturday October 20, 2018 @09:44PM
(#18266383)
Yeah but on the other side if you just let engineers do everything "the right way", we'll never deliver anything because there's always a "better" way to do it. I agree that "success-based planning" is ultra bad, but engineering needs to be held to some level of accountability.
Or maybe I just blame capitalism, haha. No deadlines! I do this because I like it!
And then, of course, for the PM's and upper management layers, the fact that their project "met the date" is what is measured and congratulated all around. The product could be a stinking pile of XXXX, but "it met the date", so they get their kudo's, their bonuses, and the devs. and users are left with "stinking pile of XXXX".