News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Climate change and the 75% problem by colordrops on Wednesday October 17, 2018 @12:11PM (#18240474)
That's an absurd claim. It doesn't have to be incentivized through block rewards, but rather through multiple governments passing laws that they submit a certain amount of mining power. The hash rate could be orders of magnitude less than the current Bitcoin hash rate and still be secure against transactional fraud.

In fact it doesn't even need to be proof of work based, as long as all entities permitted to operate on the chain are known.

Re:Climate change and the 75% problem by sp332 on Wednesday October 17, 2018 @12:31PM (#18240711)
If the authority for verifying and authenticating entities is centralized, you don't need a blockchain. A centralized, publicly-readable database is the same thing.
Re:Climate change and the 75% problem by colordrops on Wednesday October 17, 2018 @08:08PM (#18244932)
Where did I say anything about centralization?
Re:Climate change and the 75% problem by sp332 on Wednesday October 17, 2018 @09:22PM (#18245216)
"all entities permitted to operate on the chain"

Who does the permitting?

Re:Climate change and the 75% problem by colordrops on Wednesday October 17, 2018 @09:29PM (#18245250)
Just because a single entity boots up a blockchain doesn't make it centralized. Satoshi set the initial rules for Bitcoin - does that make it centralized?

If there are 196 countries in the world they could all be registered as valid entities using their respective public keys. New entities could be added is through a soft fork of mining/processing nodes that add public keys to the list, and thus would be distributed consensus like other blockchains.

Re:Climate change and the 75% problem by Max_aaa on Wednesday October 17, 2018 @01:34PM (#18241395)
But then we cannot use buzzwords...