Re:China May Have $5.8T in Hidden Debt with ‘Titanic’ Risks
by megaman8 on Tuesday October 16, 2018 @04:37PM
(#18233023)
No property taxes.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:China May Have $5.8T in Hidden Debt with ‘Titanic’ Risks
by onlyrealcuzzo on Tuesday October 16, 2018 @06:48PM
(#18233958)
But also no private property, right? Isn't everything a 99 year lease?
Re:China May Have $5.8T in Hidden Debt with ‘Titanic’ Risks
by samspenc on Tuesday October 16, 2018 @08:13PM
(#18234429)
No private property rights in China, correct, it's 99 year leases. This is why rich Chinese use their money to purchase assets (including real estate) overseas.
I'm curious about the no property taxes comment though - does that refer to China or Japan? I thought China had taxes on everything, including property.
Re:China May Have $5.8T in Hidden Debt with ‘Titanic’ Risks
by onlyrealcuzzo on Tuesday October 16, 2018 @11:16PM
(#18235859)
There is no property tax in China. It's a 99 year lease, so the original purchase is basically a tax.
Re:China May Have $5.8T in Hidden Debt with ‘Titanic’ Risks
by thedailymail on Wednesday October 17, 2018 @01:23AM
(#18236317)
Japan definitely has property taxes (I'm a homeowner there).
Re:China May Have $5.8T in Hidden Debt with ‘Titanic’ Risks
by megaman8 on Thursday October 18, 2018 @12:26PM
(#18249663)
yes, but functionaly it's the same thing. "Ownership" in other countries is just a legal construct. It's not like you can do whatever you want with it. There are countless rules and regulations you must follow - you can't build on it or touch in anyway without getting permits and your "property" can be confiscated if you don't pay taxes on it. So, I would argue no property rights with 0 property taxes is more like true ownership.
Re:China May Have $5.8T in Hidden Debt with ‘Titanic’ Risks
by netheril96 on Wednesday October 17, 2018 @01:30AM
(#18236337)
No, a 70 year lease.