Re:Priority Queue on Ethereum with a 15 ETH Bug Bounty
by FatalLogic on Tuesday October 16, 2018 @02:47PM
(#18232059)
No, of course I'm not proposing anything like that. On the contrary, I was saying that it seemed impossible. Can't you see we actually agree about that!
I pointed out other possible problems with the original suggestion that news agencies should use blockchains. But you seem to completely misunderstand those words as being an attempt to support that original suggestion. Why?
I'm amazed that your reply to me repeats almost exactly what I had just said: "[blockchain could] store a hash of published revisions ... [but] copies of the original articles would be much too expensive to store on today's typical blockchains."
I hope this won't sound rude, but I've got to suggest that you read what people are actually saying, instead of assuming you know what they're going to say.
Re:Priority Queue on Ethereum with a 15 ETH Bug Bounty
by FatalLogic on Friday October 19, 2018 @05:10PM
(#18260087)
No wonder you have so many "exhausting arguments".... you're not listening to anyone but yourself.
The fact that storing data on the blockchain is expensive is also not an optimization problem that can be solved easily with incremental optimizations, it stems from the fact that the data is transferred and mirrored forever on thousands of nodes. If storing data on the blockchain was cheap you'd quickly run into scalability problem. People who run Blockchain nodes don't want to mirror Wikipedia, the output of all the world's newspaper and child porn archives on their servers.