Re:Invisible Manipulation: ways our data is being used again...
by candiodari on Sunday October 21, 2018 @07:25PM
(#18270970)
Actually, when you link up 2 neural networks, or even a neural network and, say, a search algorithm, the neural network rapidly learns to use the external algorithm to do what it was planning to do anyway.
So there is no "beating" a neural network. The reward for having such a search algorithm is simply the ability to put thoughts into your mind. Your mind may still reject them, and if you don't feed it enough relevant data, it will rapidly abandon you.
Re:Invisible Manipulation: ways our data is being used again...
by paulgrant999 on Thursday October 25, 2018 @09:34AM
(#18300759)
presuming you don't just abandon the search is irrelevant. :)
which is why I don't stress that "agree to disagree over similar premises". can be both a hindrance, and a benefit.
Re:Invisible Manipulation: ways our data is being used again...
by l0b0 on Tuesday October 16, 2018 @05:49AM
(#18228016)
Is it called "dwell"? Because it's a useful word for an incredibly annoying trend that Google were doing the last few months I used it: whenever I searched for a word I'd used in a previous search they would try really hard to get me the same results as before, including ignoring quoted words and minus-prefixed strings. At that point I just really wanted Google to forget my previous searches, but of course that's impossible. Since I'm interested in more than one thing, using a different search engine is just better.
On a related note, Google seems to be doing something similar with startpage.com searches, I guess because mostly geeks use it. Or else they are somehow getting enough data through startpage.com to identify me.
Re:Invisible Manipulation: ways our data is being used again...
by paulgrant999 on Tuesday October 16, 2018 @10:21AM
(#18229583)
dwell is a technical term from production lines ;) it means you adjust the speed at which your conveyer runs, to offer more time under a particular process (implemented along the line). typically heating.
Google, like Amazon, and Apple, have jumped the shark.
Facebook, is the shark. ;)
You convert a fixed problem ('locate search terms that have a high correlation to what I am searching for') to a fuzzy problem of "how can I guess what this person is searching for, based on a sequence of search terms, where I manipulate the results, thereby gauranteeing that the search sequence is poisoned by what I presume they are searching for').
Oddly enough, the latter, is how you get high dwell on a search engine (COUGH COUGH).
as soon as I started using duckduckgo - bang, back to 1 minute searches as I just altered my search terms and actually got back, what I wanted.