News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:What you can't say (2004) by kennywinker on Monday October 15, 2018 @01:32PM (#18221733)
> In 2018, it's morally unfashionable to mention the excesses of the social justice movement.

It seems like there are many social circles where this is expected, not unfashionable. In the world we live in, all these “norms” are context dependent.

Re:What you can't say (2004) by lowry on Monday October 15, 2018 @01:47PM (#18221868)
He should have said, criticise publicly.
Re:What you can't say (2004) by zabuni on Monday October 15, 2018 @02:02PM (#18222030)
Jonathan Chait makes a living doing that.
Re:What you can't say (2004) by candiodari on Monday October 15, 2018 @01:45PM (#18221851)
I guess those circles just seem very far away when you're in the bay area.
Re:What you can't say (2004) by weberc2 on Monday October 15, 2018 @01:54PM (#18221947)
I'm in the midwest fwiw.
Re:What you can't say (2004) by scarecrowbob on Monday October 15, 2018 @03:16PM (#18222767)
Here in the Texas hill country, there is this funny fashion where folks complain about how they can't complain about the excesses of "the social justice movement". It's a very meta kind of fashion to see in action.

It's neat though... it's always funny to hear some duder talking about how he can't even say something that he's saying.

Re:What you can't say (2004) by candiodari on Monday October 15, 2018 @03:34PM (#18222934)
Okay. I feel like it's time for experiment ! Or, one might say, "reproducing the behavior of which is spoken".

"I think the immigration flows into Europe are over the top, the EU population cannot seriously be expected to cope with them, or with the economic consequences of said flows, without massive protests"

This is not even a racist statement, at least not in my opinion. But it is definitely "something you can't say". Let's see how quickly this post gets downvoted.

One might argue "but surely nobody would be baited out that easily and transparently", right ? Let's see.

I leave myself fully open to being shown to be very wrong here. I'm making it real easy. All that has to be done is that such a statement must be left alone when it's an obvious bait, and in facts repeats 3 times that it is bait.

Let's see.

Re:What you can't say (2004) by kennywinker on Tuesday October 16, 2018 @01:43PM (#18231434)
But late to the party, but:

> the EU population cannot seriously be expected to cope with them, or with the economic consequences of said flows, without massive protests

This statement makes no sense. People don’t like it, therefore it’s bad? Not an argument against it.

:)

Re:What you can't say (2004) by candiodari on Monday October 15, 2018 @08:26PM (#18225376)
Well I must admit I'm wrong. Glad to see it actually.