The person I am replying to is arguing based on supposed firsthand experience. Their supposed expertise based on firsthand experience sounds dubious on the face of it and is also being called into question by others:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18210799

Everything I have read indicates it can be a mild drug. That isn't straight up crazy talk.

It shouldn't be outright dismissed based on "I was in Colombia once and tried something I imagine is pure, never mind that I don't even speak the language."

That isn't a fair characterization. Most of this is going to be subjective because there's no quantifiable metric for a drug's "pleasantness," but crystalized cocaine is the 1:1 comparison being made.

Perhaps worded a little sharper than I really intended. Other than that, it's not terribly different from what you are saying.

There is a very relevant difference between active and inactive cuts. The cocaine I tried likely had inactive cuts, which calls my assessment of field prices into question, but not active cuts as it makes no economic sense, and thus wouldn't affect my anecdotal assessment of the mental effects of cocaine.