News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Reason We Haven’t Directly Detected Dark Matter by ianai on Saturday October 13, 2018 @06:18PM (#18210324)
Could it be antimatter? Ie are we sure through direct observation that antimatter reacts with light the same way matter does? I know antimatter has been made in laboratories, but plenty of phenomena act differently outside of the lab.

(I’m pretty sure we’re sure dark matter isn’t antimatter, but just the same, worth the thought when 5/6th of the universe is unexplainable.)

Re:The Reason We Haven’t Directly Detected Dark Matter by daeken on Saturday October 13, 2018 @06:31PM (#18210368)
I think that the properties of antimatter are pretty well established to be identical to that of matter. For instance, the light spectrum of antihydrogen is known to be exactly the same as ordinary hydrogen. I don't think many (any?) researchers are looking at antimatter as an option for dark matter.

(Also, I always thought of antimatter as an abstract thing that gets made in the lab and that was cool ... But we use it for practical things every day. For instance, PET scanners in medicine produce positrons and watch the annihilations inside your body. Astoundingly cool to me.)

Re:The Reason We Haven’t Directly Detected Dark Matter by ianai on Saturday October 13, 2018 @06:45PM (#18210415)
Good point! I forgot about PET scans.
Re:The Reason We Haven’t Directly Detected Dark Matter by saagarjha on Saturday October 13, 2018 @06:51PM (#18210434)
The problem with antimatter is that it very much interacts with normal matter, quite violently in fact. So if dark matter was antimatter we’d be bathed in a sea of radiation as it continually annihilated with ordinary matter, which would make it quite easy to detect ;)