News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tell HN: Now Washington Post is asking to turn off Firefo... by PhasmaFelis on Friday October 12, 2018 @10:27AM (#18201647)
It is, and unfortunately it's also incredible how much of it simply doesn't work, or fails in obscure ways, without JavaScript. I use NoScript on my personal laptop, and I often have to add sites to the temporary-allow list several times a day.

(Please don't say "just don't use those sites, then." I'll use something else if there's an alternative, but there often isn't, and I'm not willing to cut myself off from a big chunk of the web on principle alone.)

Re:Tell HN: Now Washington Post is asking to turn off Firefo... by mywittyname on Friday October 12, 2018 @10:40AM (#18201726)
Which is okay because most sites only require javascript served from 10-30% of the domains listed to actually function. The other 70-90% of domains serving the JS running on your browser are for tracking and monetization.

I don't mind JS, but when you go to a Kinja website, 20+ domains are serving up JS that runs in your browser. That's insane; but also very typical.