Re:Millions of workers believe they are bound by non-binding...
by sp332 on Thursday October 11, 2018 @05:12PM
(#18197079)
Yeah. I just don't understand your comment. The company and the employee both need to have some power to define the job role and compensation.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Millions of workers believe they are bound by non-binding...
by eropple on Thursday October 11, 2018 @07:28PM
(#18197865)
I agree.
As it stands, the employee, barring fairly singular instances (and, I note, I am one and I have hired them, I understand where the line goes), has no power.
They have a Hobson's choice not merely with one employer but with all of them.
Re:Millions of workers believe they are bound by non-binding...
by sp332 on Thursday October 11, 2018 @08:00PM
(#18198031)
Ok so, wouldn't you want this situation to come up more often, where a prospective employee can get the contract changed? You said you'd rather not have this happen at all.
Re:Millions of workers believe they are bound by non-binding...
by eropple on Thursday October 11, 2018 @08:14PM
(#18198104)
Except that it won't happen more often because that power imbalance exists. I have some power when negotiating because I'm experienced, I'm very good at something in extreme demand, and I'm knowledgeable about how a business works. Most people don't have two or more of those things.
You describe a senior and socially competent tech worker's delight. Some of us have empathy for those who are not. "Oh, but more people with no market power can 'negotiate'" is not a net benefit for people even if it was a beneficial situation for me.
"In its majestic equality, the law forbids rich and poor alike to sleep under bridges, beg in the streets and steal loaves of bread."