News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Millions of workers believe they are bound by non-binding... by djsumdog on Thursday October 11, 2018 @03:42PM (#18196448)
> Currently contracts seem to be nothing more than one-sided weapons that powerful companies use to get vulnerable people to do things that they otherwise wouldn’t and can’t afford to fight.

That totally hits the issue on the head. They're not negotiated contracts. They're one sided hammers.

Re:Millions of workers believe they are bound by non-binding... by BonesJustice on Thursday October 11, 2018 @05:13PM (#18197086)
Indeed. If there is no downside to stuffing contracts with every potentially useful clause they can think of, then why not do so?

Perhaps the solution is to give workers the right to have employment-related contracts reviewed and negotiated by an attorney of their choosing at the employer’s expense.

With actual costs attached, employers would suddenly have an incentive to keep their contracts as short and simple as possible, reserving the more onerous clauses for only the most senior positions.

Contracts for most positions would need to be kept short, reasonable, and comprehensible such that candidates don’t feel the need to exercise their right to attorney review.

Re:Millions of workers believe they are bound by non-binding... by wool_gather on Thursday October 11, 2018 @06:43PM (#18197620)
> Perhaps the solution is to give workers the right to have employment-related contracts reviewed and negotiated by an attorney of their choosing at the employer’s expense.

This is one of the key reasons that unions are helpful to workers: each one of them doesn't have to go through this on their own. One expert does it for all of them.