Re:Intel's New Low: Commissioning Misleading Core I9-9900K B...
by holtalanm on Thursday October 11, 2018 @01:50PM
(#18195575)
Reposting (without the inflammatory 'did you even watch the video' comment) at the request of asr:
the video doesn't dispute the benchmarks of the 9900, but rather they dispute the published compared benchmarks of the ryzen 7 2700X, which used default, unconfigured memory settings to push the benchmark down, while the 9900 benchmarks used configured memory settings (as it should)
the video doesn't dispute the benchmarks of the 9900, but rather they dispute the published compared benchmarks of the ryzen 7 2700X, which used default, unconfigured memory settings to push the benchmark down, while the 9900 benchmarks used configured memory settings (as it should)