Re:Rejection by Palantir
by throwaway5250 on Wednesday October 10, 2018 @12:40PM
(#18186534)
There is absolutely zero chance that he was rejected in 30s based on ethnicity. No matter how unethical you might think a corporation might be, none would be stupid enough to implement a policy so obviously illegal.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Rejection by Palantir
by FranzFerdiNaN on Wednesday October 10, 2018 @12:56PM
(#18186712)
Of course that was the reason he was rejected. Companies do plenty of stupid and/or illegal things, they just think they can get away with it. Just look at Theranos. Or banks wilfully working with drug dealers to launder money. Or Google and co making agreements not to steal people to keep wages down. It's all about risk management.
And yet, Harvard and all the Ivys do it all the time.
Re:Rejection by Palantir
by throwaway5250 on Wednesday October 10, 2018 @02:41PM
(#18187708)
Not in 30s.
Having some undesirable demographics myself, I'm quite aware that corporations discriminate illegally. It's so easy to hide, though, and so costly not to do so, that imagining this as an example seems a bit silly.
It’s definitely not “absolutely zero”.
Re:Rejection by Palantir
by seattle_spring on Wednesday October 10, 2018 @06:08PM
(#18189379)
Sure, in the same way -450 degrees Fahrenheit isn't technically "absolute zero."