Re:Personal Statement of a CIA Analyst
by JohnStrangeII on Sunday October 07, 2018 @07:38AM
(#18160080)
From what I've read about it, it works to some extent as long as people believe in it. They want to get their clearance and believe cheating could be detected, so they tend to be more truthful. It's based on intimidation and observation. The examination starts when you enter the building and stops when you leave it.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Something that tells the truth inconsistently and nondeterministically sounds worse for our society than just asking the question under oath.
Re:Personal Statement of a CIA Analyst
by droithomme on Monday October 08, 2018 @02:27AM
(#18164596)
It's not inconsistent though. It's never caught a single spy. So it's got a 100% false negative rate. That's very consistent and reliable.